Desensitization of Pakistani society Essay Example

Desensitization of Pakistani society Essay Example Desensitization of Pakistani society Essay Desensitization of Pakistani society Essay DESENSITIZATION: Increasing Insensitivity in our general public Contents INTRODUCTION: 3 FEW EXAMPLES OF INSENSITIVITY IN OUR SOCIETY:6 SURVEY: DESENSITIZATIONIO SOLUTIONS: 18 CONCLUSION: 18 REFERENCES: 18 INTRODUCTION: What is Desensitization? It is the procedure wherein nonstop or expanded introduction to viciousness makes an individual numb to its enthusiastic impacts. The brutality appears to be typical and to a greater extent an every day life occurrence instead of a stun. It dulls the reaction to viciousness, making it an adequate conduct. Significant purposes behind Desensitization in our Society: Increased Real Lite Violence nas came about in our socie eliciting affectability to such episodes. Pakistan has been confronting savagery as far as road wrongdoings, murders, assaults, target killings, physical torment, bomb impacts, kidnappings and automaton assaults. As indicated by insights, just in Karachi individuals are executed at the pace of 3. 6 since 2010 because of target killings. Different losses because of various reasons are much more than this when estimated. CPLC murder measurements for 2010 demonstrate there were a sum of 1339 fear based oppressor killings, I. . , murders related with psychological militant acts or gatherings. This number expanded in 2011 to 1724 psychological oppressor killings, which is an expansion of 29 ercent; 2011 was recorded as Karachis second deadliest year in the previous 20 years. As indicated by ongoing investigation it was discovered that since the start of this current year ti ll November seventeenth, there have been 323 episodes of brutality, murdering 3088 individuals (regular citizens as it were). Media Violence is another explanation that has made us very much familiar with peculiar pictures and recordings of ruthless episodes. One type of brutality that Media Violence incorporates is the viciousness appeared as diversion that is in shows, motion pictures, enlivened arrangement is one classification in particular. It presents savagery in genuine manners just as in clever ways. When discussing dramatizations or arrangement and films more often than not viciousness indicated is not kidding sort of brutality, comprising of shooting somebody, capturing, murder, assault or impacts. In any case, kid's shows and separated from that specific motion pictures or arrangement show viciousness in amusing manners like in Home alone, three numbskulls which fuses an inappropriate thought of savagery being something that is regular and the standard. Kid's shows exceptionally cause our kids to become accustomed to fundamental savagery and its devices like firearms and hazardous materials. The other type of viciousness is the genuine brutality that is secured by media and disclosed to overall population. While examining about Pakistani society, breaking news and live inclusion of bomb impacts, crowd brutality, frightening mishaps is something we as a whole are utilized to, to a level that has turned us harsh toward such occurrences. Hardly any channels have circulated twisted pictures without blue pencil or any endeavor to shroud the substance that is improper. In any case, they do over and over state to not to see the news if the watcher is a youngster or an individual with frail endurance to view such things; which isn't a powerful measure. ?Disorder is a key explanation in the expanding genuine savagery in Pakistan and its being circulated on Media. In a few occurrences the fundamental reason for such viciousness is the absence of authorization of law so as to lessen wrongdoing like robbing, target slaughtering, bomb impact and execution of discipline orders when the crooks are captured by police or officers. Crowd Violence is the best model when disorder is talked about. Since our Law requirement offices neglect to actualize law and keep up request in the public arena, our kin have begun taking law in their grasp. Up till now there are various instances of crowd viciousness in Pakistan where suspects are beaten and given over to police or now and again pounded the life out of. The recurrence of crowd viciousness episodes have expanded in ast not many years, generally in Punjab. The episodes depict startling fierceness. Be it extended periods of time of burden shedding, a criminal caught in the act by the group, a traffic disaster or somebody associated to have perpetrated the demonstration with obscenity, irate crowd progressively bring the law into their hands as though they are the sole informers, Judges and killers. This shows the disappointment of our law implementation offices that have been unsuccesstul in getting the crooks, indicting and executing them. Their followed endeavors have driven individuals, by and large, to go about as their own defenders, which has brought about some extremely remorseful episodes. Developing financial weights lately just as the states inability to give security and a working Justice framework to the individuals have exasperated these emergencies, generated vigilante Justice and settled in disorder in our every day life, contends a political specialist needing to stay mysterious, who works at an open part college in Lahore. Barely any EXAMPLES OF INSENSITIVITY IN OUR SOCIETY: BRUTAL MURDER OF TWO BROTHERS IN SIALKOT: On fifteenth May 2010, two siblings named Mughees matured 15 and Hafiz Muneeb matured 17 occupants of Sialkot were fiercely pounded the life out of. They were blamed for grabbing an ell telephone and harming the individual while carrying out the wrongdoing. Not many individuals associated them with being the guilty parties and in this manner, were exposed to harsh torment prompting passing. The more youthful sibling Mughees passed on when struck scarcely by a bar anyway the senior one Muneeb was beaten severely with poles, stones, sticks until he kicked the bucket. Them two were beaten considerably after each drop of life was overflowed out of them, absorbing blood. It is expressed that the senior one asked to be shot dead for once and just for the wrongdoing he hadnt submitted rather being beaten such insensitively. The dead bodies were hanged over a water tank and were hauled also. This episode shows not just the bigotry and frightful fierceness of the group yet in addition outrageous inhumanity of the individuals who watched and shot the demonstration. There were around 10 to 15 individuals who were associated with their homicide however in excess of 40 individuals just as police authorities to observe the demonstration. The inquiry emerges why the group indicated no response of halting the rough deadly beating? Why they all saw the go about as though they were entranced or as robots totally void of the humanly sentiments and feelings? This horde brutality shows that our general public is a harsh one; It has without a doubt been desensitized. The explanation I account the episode for is absence of law which has essentially annihilated the feeling of mankind in us; which has prompted us taking the law in hands since the police have neglected to assume their job. We have assumed the liability to distinguish the lawbreakers with no strong confirmation of their character and rebuff them ourselves. Since, we have no appropriate framework to do as such, we wind up submitting acts that can't be washed away, and they exist as ruthless stains of the blood of blameless ones-the misidentified and slaughtered. Such demonstrations of horde brutality and individuals beating the offenders have over and again occurred. Be that as it may, the beaten ones were the genuine hoodlums yet such episodes gradually and slowly move the force from law authorization organizations to nearby open which is a solid caution for our police and Judiciary as it can prompt outcomes making a standard less society. In a re-establishment of the Sialkot lynching, two claimed looters fall prey to anarchy in Multan on March 26. One of them apparently shot himself to keep away from an agonizing passing on account of the group. The other was pelted with stones until he kicked the bucket. The deplorable part of these episodes is that police authorities side with the crowd, choosing not to see the rutal, moment disciplines distributed to genuine or envisioned lawbreakers. Subsequently, again demonstrated that we botn local people and the police nave ourselves made this demonstration ot executing individuals be it a guilty party or an honest. Another part of this is our media continued indicating the recordings and the photos of every one of these individuals being killed, which shows that our media is likewise a coldhearted substance who paying little heed to what influence their material has, pretense the substance. Not thinking about the relatives of the casualties who need to remember the unbearable and anguishing snapshots of their friends and family eing beaten, consumed and executed. THE LACK OF RESPONSE OF PEOPLEIN INCIDENTS LIKE LDA FIRE ACCIDENT AND STATE LIFE BUILDING FIRE INCIDENT: The state life building fire occurrence occurred on November 28th 2012, where one Job searcher named Owais Baig who had gone for Job meet passed on. So as to spare himself from fire, he attempted to escape out of the window, sticking to it for around ten to fifteen minutes; be that as it may, he couldn't hold it for quite a while, in this way, tumbled from 8 story building, causing himself deadly wounds. The explanation I accept this depicted absence of affectability and reaction by the individuals is cap he dangle from the window for around ten minutes least however during that time nobody made any endeavors to help him in any capacity. The video unmistakably shows that he fell in the zone which is nearly the main floor, an overhang type territory, which was effectively open and reachable if individuals would have hurried there to in any event get him or utilized any material to guarantee his fall was not amazingly damaging, Unfortunately, individuals were caught up with recording the situation or Just watching the lamentable scene. The news channels indeed acted harshly airing the video over and over. On May 9 013, fire broke out in LDA building prompting 5 individuals Jumping from the structure as they made bombed endeavors to spare themselves from the bursting fire or one of them who hung tight for over four hours for him being saved. Thus, grasping demise. The news channels constantly broadcast the entire episode for quite a long time. Rehashing the video where individuals Jumped from the structure. For them it was minor an inclusion of the inferno at LDA however for those whose friends and family favored passing through tumbling from the stature of 135 feet to the ground instead of being scorched by fire, it was the most exceedingly terrible thing. Our media without considering their sentiments not

Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essays

Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essays Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essay Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essay The Hebrew s left little writing to demo their imposts. Truth be told the solitary writing that is left from Hebrew society is otherworldly content. The core abstract plants being the Torah or Pentateuch, which is the initial five books of the Bible. These plants were non assembled all together of books until after the harvest time of the Hebrew state. From these writings we gain proficiency with a few things about how they lived. They were an extremely thorough society. They were non human-centric, however accepted that God was the solitary of import being. This human advancement had a monotheistic conviction. The God that they adored was an only God and they did non request Him. God had full authority over what took topographic point in their progress. On the off chance that they addressed God they accepted that they would be rebuffed. Despite the fact that Hebraic human advancement is extremely unique in relation to present day twenty-four hours progress, there are three of import inside informations that are as yet significant today. First Hebrew human advancement was a Patriarchal society. Following, dress was of import to the situation of grown-up male. Last, justness was of import to their way of life. All through this exposition I am making a trip to elucidate how these things were winning to their general public and how they are as yet a part of our own today. One way that cutting edge human advancement is like the Hebrew s is that it was a Patriarchal society. In the account of Noah in the book of Genesis no names of the grown-up females are referenced. In spite of the fact that our general public has come a long way in this nation. We are as yet a grown-up male first society. In a marriage the grown-up females for the most part take the grown-up male s last name. A customary pre-marriage ceremony regularly finishes with the expression I currently present to you Mr. furthermore, Mrs. embed grown-up male s name here. In most two-parent puts the grown-u p male is the caput of the family. This is valid in my family unit in any event. Work powers are ordinarily the 1s that hold the greater part of the elevated level occupations in America. Most political spots are help by work powers each piece great. They ordinarily make a higher salary than grown-up females in a similar spot as them. In the story of imaginative action the Hebrew s saw Eve in a low-level place and accept that she was the ground for the pre-winter of grown-up male. This sets the stage for how starting now and into the foreseeable future grown-up females are nt referenced so a lot and are in lower puts in the Torah. Despite the fact that our general public is nt near each piece man centric as the Hebrew s were, we despite everything have plentifulness of sexual orientation imbalance. Another characteristic of Hebrew development that is as yet seeable today is the manner by which array were of import and demonstrated the situation of grown-up male. This is clear in the story of Joseph, which is other than in the book of Genesis. The coat that Joseph is given implied riches. The Jews adored holding a group of shading in their array. The length of a coat other than was of import in the family unit. As Joseph rose in influence his array exemplified more riches. As he fell in force or position he was deprived of his clothes or had clothes as pieces of clothing. In our general public today array oftentimes demo position. People groups need to buy the top exchange names so they can lift to a higher position or if nothing else seem like they are of a higher class. People groups in high places are relied upon to have on more pleasant vesture than those in the lower classes. People groups believe this happens simply in secondary school with fledglings however this is basic in adults each piece great. The extravagant shops that well off, sharp individuals store at, ensure that it is non simple for low class individuals to shop where they shop. Garments, as in the Hebrew human progress shows position of the social orders individuals. Third, justness was a property that was of import to the Hebrew s. It is something that is other than of import in our general public in spite of the way that we see it extremely in any case than the Hebrew s did in their clasp. Their situation of justness is shown in how God rebuffs His kin. It is appeared in a significant number of the artistic plants that we have considered. The story of Creation shows their situation of justness. Adam was condemned to an existence of troublesome work alongside each other homo that was to come. Eve would suffer from birth strivings and the snake would eat soil. God had justness how he saw fit of rage. That would be the manner by which the Hebrew s saw this situation. Equity is other than appeared in the story of Noah and the Tower of Babel. Today we take a gander at justness a little spot extraordinary. Our considerations of justness appear to come to a great extent fr om the court. We consider liable until demonstrated unpracticed individual or an oculus for an oculus. We most likely inquiry things not at all like the Hebrew s. In all actuality justness is a mind boggling thing in our social orders eyes. We surely do nt hold an ideal justness framework, yet it is something that we see actually very, much like the Hebrew s. In choice, the Hebrew human progress has given a couple of things to our cutting edge twenty-four hours society. We vary in numerous nations yet through clasp and various civilisations the entirety of the developments have shaped our general public into what it is today. The writing that has been abandoned from all human advancements has given us a look into how our way of life has formed into what it is today. The Hebrew conventions went along to us the attribute of a man centric culture. In spite of the fact that along these lines, life before and in part presently has been all the more hard for grown-up females. Hebrew s oth er than identified with us in the way that vesture is of import to demoing the situation of grown-up male. Last, they esteemed justness. Despite the fact that they esteemed it extremely in any case than our general public, it was as yet of import to them, much like it is to our general public. Customs are passed down from coevalss to coevalss as they are passed down things adjustment. We perceive that through the writing that we read from the past human advancements. As clasp passes by and more writing is composed we will at last be the past human advancements. What we are go forthing behind today could help decide future social orders into extraordinary 1s!

Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program is the Sole Determinant of Your Future

Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program is the Sole Determinant of Your Future mbaMission  hosts a weekly blog series, “Admissions Myths Destroyed,”  for our friends at  Beat the GMAT. Check out the BTG site for fresh material and ours for “reprints.” The following piece was penned by mbaMission Founder, Jeremy Shinewald:   Human nature dictates that amid a competitive application process â€" exaggerated by the pervasiveness of rankings and the chatter surrounding them â€" some will perceive that they are ahead of others with an acceptance at a top-school and others will perceive that they are behind their peers with an acceptance from a lower ranked school. What is often lost amid all of the worrying is that you, not your business school, are the independent variable. You, not your school, will determine your success. Many regard Harvard Business School or the Stanford Graduate School of Business as a holy grail of sorts. Their reasoning is something like, “All you have to do is get in and you are set for life!” This is undoubtedly wrong. While there are tremendous opportunities for those who graduate from Harvard or Stanford, no graduate is just given a free pass. When MBA students/graduates find summer/full time positions at prestigious firms, they are still competing with others from many schools once they enter their workplaces and (surprise!) their individual performance, not their pedigree, then determines their successes. A staff member at mbaMission recalls her MBA summer internship at JP Morgan, wherein the firm  recruited students from seventeen top MBA programs. At the end of the summer students from UPenn-Wharton, Michigan-Ross, UVA-Darden, Texas-McCombs and NYU-Stern, were asked back for full time positionsâ€" while many other schools were shutout. This is a very small sampling fr om one firm and one summer, but this simple anecdote can be an eye-opener for an MBA applicant who assumes that a top 5 or top 10 school is the “ticket.” Further, there are a myriad of studies that suggest that lower ranked schools offer a greater ROI than top-schools. In one study sponsored by GMAC, the collective of MBA programs that administers the GMAT, data suggests that lower ranked schools offer lower costs and higher returns over a ten year period (185% vs. 118%). We are not suggesting that you start applying to lower and lower ranked schools or that you shun Stanford or Harvard, both have excellent programs. Our point is simply that some applicants can too closely identify with their target schools and neglect to recognize that their internal motors have gotten them to a place in which they can compete for acceptances. These internal motors will not be shutoff during or after business school, but will continue to drive them going forward. Share ThisTweet Admissions Myths Destroyed Harvard University (Harvard Business School) Stanford University (Stanford Graduate School of Business) University of Pennsylvania (Wharton) University of Virginia (Darden) Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program Is the Sole Determinant of Your Future Human nature dictates that amid a competitive application processâ€"exaggerated by the pervasiveness of rankings and the chatter surrounding themâ€"some MBA students will perceive that they are ahead of others because they were accepted at a top school, while others will perceive that they are behind their peers because they gained acceptance from a lower-ranked school. What is often lost amid all of this worrying is that  you, not your business school, are the independent variable.  You, not your school, will determine your success. Many regard such prestigious institutions as Harvard Business School and the Stanford Graduate School of Business as a holy grail of sorts. Their reasoning is along the lines of, “All you have to do is get in and you are set for life!” This is undoubtedly wrong. Although tremendous opportunities exist for those who graduate from Harvard or Stanford, no graduate is simply given a free pass. When MBAs find summer or full-time positions at prestigious firms, they are still competing with others from many schools once they enter their workplaces, where (surprise!) their individual performanceâ€"not their pedigreeâ€"then determines their success. An mbaMission consultant recalls her MBA summer internship at J.P. Morgan, wherein the firm  recruited students from 17 top MBA programs. At the end of the summer, students from Wharton, Michigan Ross, UVA Darden, Texas McCombs, and NYU Stern were offered full-time positions, while students from many other schools were left out. This simple anecdote features a very small sampling from one firm and one summer, but it can be an eye-opener for an MBA applicant who assumes that a top ten school is the “ticket.” Further, a myriad of studies suggest that lower-ranked schools offer a greater return on investment than top-ranked schools. In one study sponsored by GMAC (the collective of MBA programs that administers the GMAT),  data suggests that lower-ranked schools offer lower costs and higher returns over a ten-year period  (185% vs. 118%). We are not suggesting that you start applying exclusively to lower-ranked schools or that you shun Stanford or Harvardâ€"both have excellent programs. Our point is simply that some applicants can too closely identify with their target schools and neglect to recognize that their internal motors have gotten them to a place where they can compete for acceptances. These internal motors will not be shut off during or after business school, but will continue to drive the applicants in the future. Share ThisTweet Admissions Myths Destroyed Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program Is the Sole Determinant of Your Future Human nature dictates that amid a competitive application processâ€"exaggerated by the pervasiveness of rankings and the chatter surrounding themâ€"some MBA students will perceive that they are ahead of others because they were accepted at a top school, while others will perceive that they are behind their peers because they gained acceptance from a lower-ranked school. What is often lost amid all of this worrying is that  you, not your business school, are the independent variable.  You, not your school, will determine your success. Many regard such prestigious institutions as Harvard Business School and the Stanford Graduate School of Business as a holy grail of sorts. Their reasoning is along the lines of, “All you have to do is get in and you are set for life!” This is undoubtedly wrong. Although tremendous opportunities exist for those who graduate from Harvard or Stanford, no graduate is simply given a free pass. When MBAs find summer or full-time positions at prestigious firms, they are still competing with others from many schools once they enter their workplaces, where (surprise!) their individual performanceâ€"not their pedigreeâ€"then determines their success. An mbaMission consultant recalls her MBA summer internship at J.P. Morgan, wherein the firm  recruited students from 17 top MBA programs. At the end of the summer, students from Wharton, Michigan Ross, UVA Darden, Texas McCombs, and NYU Stern were offered full-time positions, while students from many other schools were left out. This simple anecdote features a very small sampling from one firm and one summer, but it can be an eye-opener for an MBA applicant who assumes that a top ten school is the “ticket.” Further, a myriad of studies suggest that lower-ranked schools offer a greater return on investment than top-ranked schools. In one study sponsored by GMAC (the collective of MBA programs that administers the GMAT),  data suggests that lower-ranked schools offer lower costs and higher returns over a ten-year period  (185% vs. 118%). We are not suggesting that you start applying exclusively to lower-ranked schools or that you shun Stanford or Harvardâ€"both have excellent programs. Our point is simply that some applicants can too closely identify with their target schools and neglect to recognize that their internal motors have gotten them to a place where they can compete for acceptances. These internal motors will not be shut off during or after business school, but will continue to drive the applicants in the future. Share ThisTweet Admissions Myths Destroyed Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program Is the Sole Determinant of Your Future Human nature dictates that amid a competitive application processâ€"exaggerated by the pervasiveness of rankings and the chatter surrounding themâ€"some MBA students will perceive that they are ahead of others because they were accepted at a top school, while others will perceive that they are behind their peers because they gained acceptance from a lower-ranked school. What is often lost amid all of this worrying is that you, not your business school, are the independent variable. You, not your school, will determine your success. Many regard such prestigious institutions as Harvard Business School or the Stanford Graduate School of Business as a holy grail of sorts. Their reasoning is along the lines of, “All you have to do is get in and you are set for life!” This is undoubtedly wrong. Although tremendous opportunities exist for those who graduate from Harvard or Stanford, no graduate is simply given a free pass. When MBAs find summer or full-time positions at prestigious firms, they are still competing with others from many schools once they enter their workplaces, where (surprise!) their individual performanceâ€"not their pedigreeâ€"then determines their success. An mbaMission consultant recalls her MBA summer internship at J.P. Morgan, wherein the firm  recruited students from 17 top MBA programs. At the end of the summer, students from Wharton, Michigan Ross, UVA Darden, Texas McCombs, and NYU Stern were offered full-time positions, while students from many other schools were left out. This simple anecdote features a very small sampling from one firm and one summer, but it can be an eye-opener for an MBA applicant who assumes that a top ten school is the “ticket.” Further, a myriad of studies suggest that lower-ranked schools offer a greater return on investment than top-ranked schools. In one study sponsored by GMAC (the collective of MBA programs that administers the GMAT),  data suggests that lower-ranked schools offer lower costs and higher returns over a ten-year period  (185% vs. 118%). We are not suggesting that you start applying exclusively to lower-ranked schools or that you shun Stanford or Harvardâ€"both have excellent programs. Our point is simply that some applicants can too closely identify with their target schools and neglect to recognize that their internal motors have gotten them to a place where they can compete for acceptances. These internal motors will not be shut off during or after business school, but will continue to drive the applicants in the future. Share ThisTweet Admissions Myths Destroyed Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program Is the Sole Determinant of Your Future Human nature dictates that amid a competitive application processâ€"exaggerated by the pervasiveness of rankings and the chatter surrounding themâ€"some MBA students will perceive that they are ahead of others because they were accepted at a top school, while others will perceive that they are behind their peers because they gained acceptance from a lower-ranked school. What is often lost amid all of this worrying is that  you, not your business school, are the independent variable.  You, not your school, will determine your success. Many regard such prestigious institutions as Harvard Business School and the Stanford Graduate School of Business as a holy grail of sorts. Their reasoning is along the lines of, “All you have to do is get in and you are set for life!” This is undoubtedly wrong. Although tremendous opportunities exist for those who graduate from Harvard or Stanford, no graduate is simply given a free pass. When MBAs find summer or full-time positions at prestigious firms, they are still competing with others from many schools once they enter their workplaces, where (surprise!) their individual performanceâ€"not their pedigreeâ€"then determines their success. An mbaMission consultant recalls her MBA summer internship at J.P. Morgan, wherein the firm  recruited students from 17 top MBA programs. At the end of the summer, students from Wharton, Michigan Ross, UVA Darden, Texas McCombs, and NYU Stern were offered full-time positions, while students from many other schools were left out. This simple anecdote features a very small sampling from one firm and one summer, but it can be an eye-opener for an MBA applicant who assumes that a top ten school is the “ticket.” Further, a myriad of studies suggest that lower-ranked schools offer a greater return on investment than top-ranked schools. In one study sponsored by GMAC (the collective of MBA programs that administers the GMAT),  data suggests that lower-ranked schools offer lower costs and higher returns over a ten-year period  (185% vs. 118%). We are not suggesting that you start applying exclusively to lower-ranked schools or that you shun Stanford or Harvardâ€"both have excellent programs. Our point is simply that some applicants can too closely identify with their target schools and neglect to recognize that their internal motors have gotten them to a place where they can compete for acceptances. These internal motors will not be shut off during or after business school, but will continue to drive the applicants in the future. Share ThisTweet Admissions Myths Destroyed Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program Is the Sole Determinant of Your Future Human nature dictates that amid a competitive application processâ€"exaggerated by the pervasiveness of rankings and the chatter surrounding themâ€"some MBA students will perceive that they are ahead of others because they were accepted at a top school, while others will perceive that they are behind their peers because they gained acceptance from a lower-ranked school. What is often lost amid all of this worrying is that youâ€"not your business schoolâ€"are the independent variable. Youâ€"not your schoolâ€"will determine your success. Many regard Harvard Business School or the Stanford Graduate School of Business as a holy grail of sorts. Their reasoning is along the lines of, “All you have to do is get in and you are set for life!” This is undoubtedly wrong. Although tremendous opportunities exist for those who graduate from Harvard or Stanford, no graduate is simply given a free pass. When MBAs find summer or full-time positions at prestigious firms, they are still competing with others from many schools once they enter their workplaces, where (surprise!) their individual performanceâ€"not their pedigreeâ€"then determines their success. A staff member at mbaMission recalls her MBA summer internship at J.P. Morgan, wherein the firm  recruited students from 17 top MBA programs. At the end of the summer, students from Wharton, Michigan Ross, UVA Darden, Texas McCombs, and NYU Stern were offered full-time positions, while students from many other schools were left out. This simple anecdote features a very small sampling from one firm and one summer, but it can be an eye-opener for an MBA applicant who assumes that a top 10 school is the “ticket.” Further, a myriad of studies suggest that lower-ranked schools offer a greater return on investment than top-ranked schools. In one study sponsored by GMAC (the collective of MBA programs that administers the GMAT),  data suggests that lower-ranked schools offer lower costs and higher returns over a ten-year period  (185% vs. 118%). We are not suggesting that you start applying exclusively to lower-ranked schools or that you shun Stanford or Harvardâ€"both have excellent programs. Our point is simply that some applicants can too closely identify with their target schools and neglect to recognize that their internal motors have gotten them to a place where they can compete for acceptances. These internal motors will not be shut off during or after business school, but will continue to drive the applicants in the future. Share ThisTweet Admissions Myths Destroyed Blog Archive MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed Your MBA Program Is the Sole Determinant of Your Future Human nature dictates that while engaged in a competitive MBA application processâ€"exaggerated by the pervasiveness of rankings and the chatter surrounding themâ€"some candidates will perceive that they are ahead of others because they were accepted at a top school, while others will perceive that they are behind their peers because they were accepted at a lower-ranked school. What is often lost amid all this worrying is that you, not your target business school, are the independent variable. You, not your target school, will determine your success. Many regard such prestigious institutions as Harvard Business School and the Stanford Graduate School of Business as some sort of holy grail and believe, “All you have to do is get in and you are set for life!” This is patently wrong. Although tremendous opportunities exist for those who graduate from Harvard or Stanford, no graduate is simply given a free pass. When MBAs find summer or full-time positions at prestigious firms, they are still competing with others from many schools once they enter the workplace, where (surprise!) their individual performanceâ€"not their pedigreeâ€"then determines their success. An mbaMission Senior Consultant recalls her MBA summer internship at J.P. Morgan. The firm had recruited students from 17 top MBA programs, and at the end of the summer, students from Wharton, Michigan Ross, UVA Darden, Texas McCombs, and NYU Stern were offered full-time positions, while students from many other schools were not. This simple anecdote features a very small sampling from one firm and one summer, but it can be an eye-opener for an MBA applicant who assumes that a top ten school is a kind of guaranteed “ticket.” Further, a myriad of studies suggest that lower-ranked schools offer a greater return on investment than top-ranked schools. In one study sponsored by GMAC (the collective of MBA programs that administers the GMAT), data suggested that lower-ranked schools offer lower costs and higher returns over a ten-year period (185% vs. 118%). We are not saying that you should start applying exclusively to lower-ranked schools or shun Stanford or Harvardâ€"both have excellent programs. Our point is simply that some applicants focus too exclusively on their target schools and neglect to recognize that their unique experiences, skills, and potential are what have made them competitive applicants in the first place. And these qualities will not be nullified during or after business school but will instead continue to drive them in the future. Share ThisTweet Admissions Myths Destroyed